In
recent years the United States has been dealing with staggering and alarming
rates of obesity, heart disease, and other health problems amongst the
population in association to the people’s eating habits. Both Pollan’s “Unhappy
Meals” and Dupuis’s “Angels and Vegetables” delve into the politics history of
the people of the United States. In particular, on the main questions that both
papers try to address is “what is it about the United States as a nation
that commits itself to present excess while placing great hope in future
moderation (Dupuis ,1)?” Both authors focus and how events in our past have
influenced our eating habits in the present, as well as the consequences of the
way we eat.
The
main focus that Dupuis chooses to delve into is the gastropolitics of the
United States and how reform and diet are related to one another. In
particular, Dupuis focuses on our eating habits being affected by two main
things, a messenger, and a mediator (Dupuis, 2). Dupuis goes on to explain that much of the reforms to our
eating habits have stemmed from religion and science (messengers), but the ones to directly influence others
using such messengers are preachers or scientist (the mediators). Dupuis also goes on that the questions
“what to eat?” is not what we should be focusing as a people, but instead focus
on the stigma that this questions poses in the first place.
On
the other hand, Pollan’s “Unhappy Meals” is also about our eating habits, but
with a higher focus on nutritionism.
His article examines the notion of “food” becoming “nutrient” and how there are
some serious weaknesses with nutrient ideology. He examines how it is our focus
in nutritionism that has led to some of the problems we are facing today.
No comments:
Post a Comment